Wednesday, September 30, 2009

Let us rise and speak our minds

The Chocolaty Morsels Affair (CMA) is upon us again. Just as chocolaty morsels are not truly chocolate chips, the CMA does not spend nearly enough on actually CATHOLIC Ministries. Every year an assessment is made on each parish of the diocese (much like New York "assesses" our electric bills, coercively and in support of profligate spending) for a program that spends more money keeping itself going than it does on Catholic schools. Not surprisingly, many Catholics in Rochester are opposed to feeding a huuuguh slush fund, particularly those who have felt its administrators' coldness.

We have no issue with certain aspects of CMA spending. We fully support the funding allocated to Catholic Schools, Faith Formation, Parish Support Ministries, Catholic Charities, Stewardship, and Hospital Chaplaincy. However, this amounts to between 50 and 60 percent of CMA funding. It is unreasonable to ask the remaining Catholics in a failing diocese to spend over $2,500,000 on HR, IT, overhead costs, and a pastoral center in which very few regularly set foot. Why, precisely, do we spend CMA dollars on St Bernard's, when we need a separate drive to fund our semenarians? Shouldn't funding the education of our future priests come ahead of funding the educations of lay folks? And what of planning services? Why should any parish slated to be closed be the very folks who pay for their own demise? This seems not only illogical, but absurd! Finally, $329,400 went to...fliers and a video which makes many parishioners at St Stanislaus sick to their stomaches? This is an outrage!

It is time that more Catholics in Rochester stand up to this bullying. Some have been doing so admirably for years, but not enough. And it is not enough merely to refrain from sending money to the diocese for this fund. If we do nothing, the money will be extorted from our parishes like a tax and that will be the end of it. We need to be more active.

That is why Arialdus and I are proposing a different kind of campaign to counter the CMA. In his recent "envirolope" message to the diocese, Bishop Clark states that: "Your pledge to this year's annual appeal will help us to continue to preach, to teach, and to serve." He is right about one thing, we must preach, teach, and serve. But what does he preach, what does he teach, and whom does he serve? It seems not to be the children in our Monroe County Catholic School System. He seems not to serve our parishes as still more are slated for closure. It certainly doesn't seem to be that he wants the truth of Christ to get out, what with lay "pastoral" administrators like Joan Sobala running around. It seems that the CMA would not be an appropriate place for our scarce funds in such difficult economic times.

What we can do, however, is give to other, more reputable, more orthodox organizations who preach, who teach, and who serve God and His Church faithfully. We propose that you let the diocese have its cake and send back the envelopes with a message of our faith and a pledge to support other, more orthodox, ministries. Enclose a note explaining clearly your actions and their reasons.

For example, we will be donating $20 to:
the Catholics Come Home Campaign for its preaching.
Una Voce for its preaching and teaching.
the Sisters of Reparation for their serving.
the Seminarian Fund for their preaching, teaching, and serving.
the Station of the Cross for its preaching, teaching, and serving
and the Archangels School for its preaching and teaching.

We will be happy to contribute to the CMA when 1. Schools stop closing, 2. Parishes stop closing, 3. Catholics stop leaving, 4. Nuns in albs or jeans stop ruling with an iron fist, and 5. Talks by notorious dissenters like Charles Curran cease to be sponsored by diocesan entities

In the interim, however, this is our approach. It serves dual purposes--it sends the message that we disagree with the spending of the CMA, and it supports Authentic Catholic Ministries, which is, after all, the whole point of the CMA.

Let us pray for the restoration of authentic, traditional, Catholic faith to the Diocese of Rochester.

-Arialdus and Bellarmine

11 comments:

  1. My friend recently sold the home of his deceased mother. The buyer of the house claimed to have received a hefty amount of support from the Roman Catholic Diocese of Rochester, which was to be used towards the purchase of the house. My friend described this purchaser to be a shifty character, who is not truly poor and was talking about how she planned to run an Internet auction business out of his mother's home, and that she was of course not even Roman Catholic. She even stated that although she is required to reside there for 5 years, she would probably sell the house after that time!

    So no, my money is not going to go to support non-Catholic scam artists trying to get money to buy a house dirt cheap that they plan on selling in a few years for a hefty profit. Sorry, DoR.

    ~Dr. K

    ReplyDelete
  2. I was curious where you got you data in regards to the break down of how the $5.49M spent. I don't see it on the diocese's website. I'm just wondering if they disclose all of the organizations that they support. Even more specifically, I want to make sure they don't support organizations like Fortunate Families
    This is from their history:
    1996

    September CGLFM and the Diocese of Rochester formalize their relationship, stating that CGLFM does ministry with gay and lesbian Catholics and their families on behalf of the Diocese.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ben, the breakdown used to be here: http://www.dor.org/sd/cma_allocation.html

    But that was before the Diocese removed all the percentages for the CMA allocation. When did that happen anyways? They had them posted at least as late as September 22nd.

    ~Dr. K

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ben, et. al:

    Here is how the page I linked to above appeared as of late September. Compare this to how the page appears today. You'll notice that my saved copy of the page has all the allocation percentages while the current page is lacking this information.

    ~Dr. K

    ReplyDelete
  5. Wow, so, the page I linked has changed in less than a day!?!?!? I feel empowered!
    -Bellarmine

    ReplyDelete
  6. Maybe these percentages were "accidentally" removed while editing the page. ;-)

    ~Dr. K

    ReplyDelete
  7. I guess that explains it. I'm gonna shoot them an email asking about it.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thanks Ben, let us know what the response is.
    -Bellarmine

    ReplyDelete
  9. I think we all know what the response will be:

    "Thank you for your concerns. Your ideas are important to us as Catholic sisters and brothers in Christ."

    ReplyDelete
  10. Arialdus and Bellarmine,

    I would argue that supporting "Faith Formation" is problematic too. Have you attended what passes for "faith formation" in our churches? I have kids ranging in age from 14-3 and I can tell you that the material is a poor excuse for catechesis. The "Blest are We" books are notorious for presenting a syncretized version of the faith and Sacrament preparation is equally lackluster. Not to mention the personal views of the religious ed teachers. No, I won't fund that.

    I have written several letters to the diocese with specific reasons for why we don't donate to the CMA. I've never gotten a letter in response.

    ReplyDelete

fancy web counter
free hit counter code